Main Site         

So what did the Didn’t Votes tell us?

2014 September 19
by Paul Vallely

Amid all the hoo-haa over the vote on the Scottish referendum not many people seem to have given much thought to the “Don’t Knows” who turned into the “Didn’t Votes”. There is nothing new about not voting in British political life. In general and local elections large numbers of people often don’t bother. Politicians tend to talk disapprovingly about voter apathy but it may be that they just do not want to hear what the non-voters are really telling them. There is a widespread sympathy for the old anarcho-nihilist sentiment: “Don’t vote because whoever you vote for the Government gets in”.

Of course a referendum on independence is a different matter, which is why turnout was always predicted to be higher than in national and local government elections. But, despite the constant “too close to call” polls, even up to the week of voting, there were a significant number of the electorate declaring themselves to be Don’t Knows. Polls varied, with some saying the Don’t Knows were as few as 4 per cent but others placing them as high as 20 per cent. Between 12 and 15 per cent was the consensus.

There is more than one kind of Don’t Know. To borrow from the Donald Rumsfeld Book of Logic there are Known Don’t Knows and Unknown Don’t Knows. That is, some of those in this category simply hadn’t made up their minds until the last minute – or who had decided but who pretended they hadn’t for fear of emotional reprisals from friends and families. But others couldn’t or wouldn’t make up their minds when the polls closed.

The Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, the Rt Revd John Chalmers, in a sermon on Sunday, cited the example of Elijah in the Book of Kings where he faces the people and asks them to make up their minds about their faith.  He personally found making a choice was hard, the Moderator said, “because I’m one of those people who has spent a lifetime trying to see both sides of every argument, trying to work out complicated ‘middle ways’ that keep as many people as possible content. But I’m not going to get away with that this week. On this issue like the people of Israel standing before Elijah I need to come off the fence.”

I am not sure that theology helped that much here, any more than other factors like the emotional pull of music – Flower of Scotland versus Land of Hope and Glory – or the endorsement of celebrities. There must have been as many people repulsed as attracted by the tasteless comic Frankie Boyle or the anachronistic marchers of the Orange Lodge.  The same was true of politicians, with the aggressive self-righteousness of Alex Salmond versus the impotent lacrimosity of David Cameron.

There were, of course, persuasive arguments on both sides – just as there were powerful repellents from those who implied that the other side were just a bit too dim to understand the facts.  But in the end it may be that the Didn’t Votes were not unable to weigh the advantage of one argument over another but rather were paralysed by seeing the disadvantage of both.  In that they may have had the most potent message of all for the rest of us.


The Church Times

Comments are closed.